Supreme Court of California

Plaintiff's petition to remove conditions imposed on his development permit is denied as a result of plaintiff's failure to bring an action within 90 days of the permit's issuance.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/29/2004
• Published 07/29/2004

Judges

• WERDEGAR, J.

Court

• Supreme Court of California

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
•  Steven Travis, Stanley M. Sokolow and Sonya Sokolow, in pro. per.;   Pacific Legal Foundation, James S. Burling and Harold E. Johnson, Sacramento, for Plaintiffs and Appellants., Paul B. Campos, San Ramon, for The California Building Industry Association, Home Builders Association of Northern California and Building Industry Legal Defense Foundation as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants., Harold Griffith, Freedom, as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants., Law Offices of Rosario Perry and Rosario Perry, Santa Monica, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.,  Pahl & Gosselin, Stephen D. Pahl and Karen Kubala McCay, San Jose, for California Apartment Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Richard M. Frank, Chief Assistant Attorney General, J. Matthew Rodriquez, Assistant Attorney General, Joseph Barbieri, Christiana Tiedemann and Alice Busching Reynolds as Amici Curiae.


• For Appellees:
  
• Samuel Torres, Jr., and Dana McRae, County Counsel, and Dwight L. Herr, Assistant County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent., Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney (San Francisco), Andrew W. Schwartz, William Chan and Ellen Forman, Deputy City Attorneys, for City and County of San Francisco and League of California Cities as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.