Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


Regency Outdoor Adver., Inc. v. City of W. Hollywood, B186011

Denial of petition for writ of mandate directing defendant city to invalidate a zoning amendment as the city did not review the amendment's environmental effects is affirmed over claim that the trial court erroneously relied on and Waste Management of Alameda County v. County of Alameda (2000) 79 Cal.App.4th 1223 to hold that plaintiff did not have standing under CEQA.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/25/2007
  • Published 07/25/2007

Judges

  • RUBIN, Acting P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Jackson, Demarco, Tidus & Peckenpaugh, Michael L. Tidus, Irvine, and Gregory P. Regier, Westlake Village, for Plaintiff and Appellant., Gary S. Mobley, for Real Parties In Interest Elevation Media and Sunset Sierra Properties, Inc.

  • For Appellees:
  • Michael Jenkins, City Attorney;  Jenkins & Hogin, Manhattan Beach, and John C. Cotti, for Defendant and Respondent City of West Hollywood.
Copied to clipboard