California Court of Appeal

Reversed judgment as to prohibition on grisly or gruesome displays. Appeals court directed trial court to amend judgment declaring prohibition on grisly or gruesome displays unconstitutional. In all other aspects judgment affirmed. Plaintiff, an anti-abortion activist, wished to set up information tables and display graphic images of abortions at Defendant’s retail shopping centers. Defendant sought to restrict Plaintiff’s activities and displays of grisly images. Appeals court held that Defendant’s restrictions were constitutional with the exception of the image displays.

Appellate Information

• Published 2019/07/02

Judges

• Thompson

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel