California Court of Appeal

Held that a company president may proceed with a lawsuit against another company's president for secretly recording their conversations in violation of California privacy laws. Affirmed the denial of a defense anti-SLAPP motion, because neither making the recordings nor using them as evidence in contractual arbitration was protected activity.

Appellate Information

• Published 2019/01/23

Judges

• Segal

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel