California Court of Appeal

ResetAA Font size: Print

Levingston v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., 066271

Reinstated an optometrist's whistleblower lawsuit after her attorneys failed to file an opposition to a motion for summary judgment. The optometrist's new attorneys did not file an opposition to a summary judgment motion after they were substituted into the case following the disqualification of her former attorneys, leading the trial court to find inexcusable neglect and grant summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Reversing, the Fourth Appellate District held that the optometrist was entitled to a continuance to file an opposition to the summary judgment motion.

Appellate Information

  • Argued
  • Submitted
  • Decided
  • Published 2018/08/17

Judges

  • Ramirez

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel


FindLaw Career Center

    Select a Job Title


      Post a Job  |  Careers Home

    View More