California Court of Appeal

Affirmed the denial of a motion to vacate due to insufficiency of counsel. Defendant sought to vacate his judgment and withdraw his plea of no contest for drug charges claiming that his counsel failed to advise him of immigration consequences. The court reasoned that there was no deficiency of counsel where the defendant was advised in writing of the immigration consequences for his plea.

Appellate Information

• Published 2018/06/28

Judges

• Tangeman

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel