California Court of Appeal

Affirming convictions by a jury of two defendants for robbery involving bank customers at ATMs. Evidence was sufficient to support the convictions, the existence of an identity theft statute did not preclude conviction for robbery, language used in jury instructions did not create prejudice, and there was no abuse of discretion in charging the crimes as a felony rather than a misdemeanor, but the sentencing order and abstract of judgment did not properly reflect the imposed sentence, so it was ordered corrected.

Appellate Information

• Published 2018/01/17

Judges

• NICHOLSON

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel