California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Kanno v. Marwit Capital Partners II, L.P., 052348

Affirming the judgment that the plaintiff had standing to sue in the case of a breach of contract claim with an oral modification that the defense said breached the parol evidence rule, but finding that the three written agreements at issue were, at most, partial integrations, the oral agreement was enforceable if the terms did not directly contradict the writings and was also not rendered unenforceable by the parol evidence rule.

Appellate Information

  • Decided
  • Published 2017/12/22




  • California Court of Appeal


Copied to clipboard