Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


P. v. Ledesma, 070755

Affirming the conviction of a man for kidnapping charges and modifying the judgment to accurately reflect the sentence in an appeal that challenged the underlying statute as unconstitutionally vague, but the court held that the asportation element of aggravated kidnapping was not vague despite being nonmathmatical, as with standards such as 'reasonable,' 'substantial,' and so forth.

Appellate Information

  • Published 2017/08/23

Judges

  • HUFFMAN

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

Copied to clipboard