California Court of Appeal

Affirming the conviction in the case of a serious domestic abuse because the jury's determination that the batterer did not act in self-defense was reasonable upon the evidence and the court's failure to provide Boykin-Tahl warnings upon his stipulation to the truth of the allegations was not a constitutional violation since the stipulation did not have the definite penal consequences necessary to trigger the warning.

Appellate Information

• Published 2017/08/17

Judges

• AARON

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel