Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal

Espinoza v. Shiomoto, 064252

In an action challenging the one-year suspension of petitioner's driver's license by the Department of Motor Vehicles, the denial of her petition for writ of administrative mandate is affirmed where the record supports the trial court's implied findings that: 1) petitioner was lawfully arrested on reasonable cause to believe she had been driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI); 2) petitioner refused to submit to and failed to complete a chemical test as required under the implied consent law; and 3) petitioner was afforded a fair hearing before the Department.

Appellate Information

  • Decided
  • Published 2017/01/12




  • California Court of Appeal


Copied to clipboard