California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Soto v. Motel 6 Operating, L.P., 069403

In a suit by a former employee in her individual capacity and on behalf of all aggrieved workers under the Private Attorney General Act of 2004 (PAGA), against her former employer, alleging defendant violated Labor Code section 226(a) by failing to include the monetary amount of accrued vacation pay in its employees' wage statements, the trial court's decision sustaining defendant's demurrer without leave to amend is affirmed where Section 226(a) does not require employers to include the monetary value of accrued paid vacation time in employee wage statements unless and until a payment is due at the termination of the employment relationship.

Appellate Information

  • Decided
  • Published 2016/10/20

Judges

  • HALLER

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel