California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

People v. Pak, 266718

For purposes of which value is relevant in determining whether the burglary of a pawn shop achieved through pawning stolen goods is reducible to misdemeanor shoplifting under Proposition 47 -- the value of the stolen goods pawned, or the value of the property obtained in exchange -- the trial court's judgment is affirmed but different grounds, where: 1) the relevant value for Proposition 47 purposes is that of the property received in exchange for the stolen goods; but 2) defendant did not present evidence that she obtained $950 or less from the pawn shop.

Appellate Information

  • Decided
  • Published 2016/10/05

Judges

  • COLLINS

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel