California Court of Appeal
Spring Valley Lake Assn. v. City of Victorville, 069442
In an action alleging a City failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Pub. Resources Code section 21000 et seq., and the Planning and Zoning Law, Gov. Code section 65000 et seq., when it approved a commercial real estate project, the trial court's judgment in favor of plaintiff is: 1) reversed as to WalMart's appeal where substantial evidence does not support the City's finding that the project is consistent with the general plan and the project's environmental impact report (EIR) adequately analyzed the project's greenhouse gas emissions impacts; and 2) reversed as to certain issues raised in plaintiff's cross-appeal where the City did not make all of the findings enumerated in Government Code section 66474 before approving the project's parcel map.
Appellate Information
- Published 2016/06/15
Judges
- McCONNELL
Court
- California Court of Appeal