California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

In re H.R., 263868

In a juvenile dependency proceeding, a juvenile court's finding that father was alleged father but not designated as H.R.'s biological father was affirmed where: 1) there was substantial evidence to support that father was alleged father and not biological father; and 2) allegations of failure to provide support sustained by the juvenile court were appropriate; and 3) juvenile court had appropriate jurisdiction over H.R.'s issue of support even with father's 'alleged' status.

Appellate Information

  • Decided
  • Published 2016/03/25

Judges

  • FLIER

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel