California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Lanz v. Goldstone, 141694

In a suit for malicious prosecution brought by one attorney against another, the trial court's order denying defendant's anti-SLAPP motion is affirmed where plaintiff met his burden under prong two of the anti-SLAPP analysis, demonstrating a probability of success on all three elements of malicious prosecution.

Appellate Information

  • Decided
  • Published 2015/12/29

Judges

  • RICHMAN

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel