Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


People v. Santori, 262306

Trial court's restitution order requiring defendant to pay the City of Palmdale $18,878 in restitution for 32 incidents of graffiti is affirmed where, unlike Luis M. v. Superior Court (2014) 59 Cal.4th 300 in which no factual nexus existed between the minor's conduct and the restitution order, here the People presented evidence of defendant's specific acts, and evidence was considered in calculating the amount of restitution.

Appellate Information

  • Published 2015/12/18

Judges

  • FLIER

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

Copied to clipboard