California Court of Appeal

In action by a former juvenile court dependent for violations of Penal Code section 288(a), lewd or lascivious acts with a child under the age of 14, contending that notwithstanding his commitment to the DJJ and nonminor status, the juvenile court should have maintained dependency jurisdiction over him and provided him with services under the California Fostering Connections to Success Act, Assembly Bill No. 12 (2009-2010 Reg. Session), the termination of dependency jurisdiction is affirmed where there was no error.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/15/2015
• Published 10/15/2015

Judges

• EDMON

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel