California Court of Appeal

ResetAA Font size: Print

Behm v. Clear View Technologies, H040032

In an action against officers and directors of a company in which plaintiff invested, alleging false representations, following a default judgment for plaintiff, the trial court's grant of defendant's motion to vacate the default judgment on grounds that it did not have sufficient notice of punitive damages under Code of Civil Procedure section 435.115(f) and that it was entitled to mandatory relief under section 473(b), is affirmed where: 1) due process requires that when a plaintiff moves for discovery terminating sanctions and seeks punitive damages, a statement under section 425.111(f) must be served a reasonable time before obtaining those sanctions; and 2) notice must be sufficient to afford a defendant the opportunity to fairly appraise the full amount of damages sought by the time he or she needs to respond and oppose the motion.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 10/08/2015
  • Published 10/08/2015

Judges

  • WALSH

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel


FindLaw Career Center

    Select a Job Title


      Post a Job  |  Careers Home

    View More