California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Raef v. Superior Court (People), B259792

In a petition for writ of mandate action challenging to constitutionality of Vehicle Code section 40008(a), which increases the punishment for reckless driving and other traffic offenses committed with the intent to capture an image, sound recording, or other physical impression of another person for a commercial purpose, the petition is denied where section 40008 does not violate the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, as it is a law of general application that does not target speech or single out the press for special treatment and is neither vague nor overbroad.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/30/2015
  • Published 09/30/2015

Judges

  • EPSTEIN

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel