California Court of Appeal

The trial court's judgment finding that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) lacked authority to supervise defendant on parole because his current commitment offense, failing to register as a sex offender, was not a crime that subjected him to classification as a high-risk sex offender, Pen. Code section 3000.08(a)(4), is reversed where the Legislative scheme requires parole supervision for anyone CDCR has classified as a high-risk sex offender, regardless of the current commitment offense.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/29/2015
• Published 09/29/2015

Judges

• ARONSON

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel