California Court of Appeal

In an eminent domain proceeding, plaintiff Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (SAFCA) acquired a fee simple interest in, a roadway easement over, and a temporary construction easement over a portion of defendant defendant's roughly 131-acre property in the Natomas Basin for use in connection with the Natomas Levee Improvement Program. Defendant's challenge to the compensation award is denied where the trial court: 1) did not prejudicially erred in allowing SAFCA to introduce evidence concerning "future access" to the property; and 2) did not err in allowing SAFCA's appraiser to critique his appraiser's valuation of the property.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/20/2015
• Published 05/20/2015

Judges

• BLEASE

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel