California Court of Appeal

In an action to determine what water plans the San Capistrano voters and legislators of the past have put in place, the trial court's judgment is: 1) reversed where it erred in holding that Proposition 218 does not allow public water agencies to pass on to their customers the capital costs of improvements to provide additional increments of water such as building a recycling plant; and 2) affirmed where it did not err in ruling that Proposition 218 requires public water agencies to calculate the actual costs of providing water at various levels of usage.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/20/2015
• Published 04/20/2015

Judges

• Bedsworth

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel