California Court of Appeal

Order denying defendant’s petition for resentencing under the Three Strikes Reform Act is affirmed, where the Act is not unconstitutionally vague, as the term “unreasonable risk of danger to public safety” can be objectively ascertained by reference to the petitioner’s criminal conviction history, the petitioner’s disciplinary record and record of rehabilitation while incarcerated, and any other evidence that the court determines to be relevant.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/16/2014
• Published 10/16/2014

Judges

• Robie

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel