California Court of Appeal

In this malicious prosecution action, order denying defendant's special motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute is reversed and remanded, where: 1) defendant has established his burden under the first prong of the anti-SLAPP statute to establish that plaintiff's malicious prosecution claim arises from protected activity; and 2) plaintiff has not met his burden to make a prima facie case that he has a meritorious malicious prosecution claim.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/25/2014
• Published 09/25/2014

Judges

• Irion

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel