California Court of Appeal

In this suppression action brought by defendant-driver, contending that a warrantless draw of his blood violated the Fourth Amendment, the order denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence is affirmed, where the blood draw was conducted in objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent within the meaning of Davis v. United States and therefore was not subject to the exclusionary rule.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/05/2014
• Published 09/05/2014

Judges

• Grimes

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel