California Court of Appeal

In a cross-complaint alleging that defendant misrepresented its claims over plaintiffs' property, summary judgment against plaintiff-landowners is affirmed where: 1) defendant had no duty to disclose that it claimed prescriptive easement rights; and 2) there was an absence of evidence that plaintiffs justifiably relied on an understanding that defendant had no adverse claims over the property.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/13/2014
• Published 08/13/2014

Judges

• MARQUEZ

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel