California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Templeton Action Commitee v. County of San Luis Obispo, B251788

Dismissal of an action challenging defendant-county's decision to allow a development is affirmed, where: 1) the developer, an indispensable party, may assert the statute of limitations even though it did not comply with Business and Professions Code section 17900, the so-called fictitious name statute; and 2) plaintiff filed a petition for mandate and administrative mandate attacking defendant-county's decision approving a subdivision application, but failed to serve the real party in interest within 90 days, as required by Government Code section 66499.37.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/28/2014
  • Published 07/28/2014

Judges

  • GILBERT

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

Copied to clipboard