California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

People v. Salazar, F066025

Defendant's conviction of carjacking is affirmed, where: 1) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding the jury had reached an impasse; 2) the trial court did not err when it permitted the parties to present additional argument after the jury indicated it was having difficulty reaching a verdict; 3) the trial court did not err in limiting argument; and 4) it was not unreasonable for the trial court to conclude that the prosecutor should be allowed to rebut the arguments of defense counsel, and even if error occurred, defendant cannot establish any prejudice as a result of the trial court's decision to permit the prosecutor a rebuttal argument.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/09/2014
  • Published 07/09/2014

Judges

  • CORNELL

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel