California Court of Appeal

Defendants' convictions and sentences for violating Penal Code section 502.5 by taking improvements or fixtures from their foreclosed home are affirmed but modified, where: 1) section 502.5 is not unconstitutionally vague; 2) the trial court did not err in instructing the jury on the term "fixture" or on the great taking enhancement; but 3) defendants should be ordered to pay probation supervision costs in a separate order, rather than as a condition of probation.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/12/2014
• Published 05/12/2014

Judges

• IKOLA

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel