California Court of Appeal

The trial court did not err in denying plaintiffs' petition for writ of administrative mandamus challenging defendant-city's decision to grant a variance to real party in interest Scurlock allowing him to build a house that does not comply with the 20-foot front yard setback requirement in the City's municipal code, where: 1) defendant-city did not violate the Municipal Code provisions making it unlawful to expand a nonconforming structure; and 2) substantial evidence supported the City's findings approving a variance to the front yard setback requirements.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/14/2014
• Published 03/14/2014

Judges

• IRION

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel