California Court of Appeal

Judgment entered in favor of defendant-employer on plaintiffs' preconception tort claims alleging that plaintiff-minor was born with a number of birth defects allegedly caused by the minor's father's exposure to toxic chemicals at defendant-employer, is reversed and remanded, where: 1) defendant did not owe a preconception duty to plaintiff-minor; but 2) that lack of duty was not fatal to plaintiff-minor's strict products liability claim.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/27/2014
• Published 01/27/2014

Judges

• PREMO

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel