California Court of Appeal

Judgment for plaintiff in its claims for fraudulent transfers against defendant is affirmed, where: 1) plaintiff did not split its cause of action because breaching a contract inflicts harm on a legally protected interest different from tortious conduct that renders uncollectable a judgment arising from the breach of contract, so two different primary rights arise; and 2) res judicata and claims preclusion did not apply.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/24/2014
• Published 01/24/2014

Judges

• RUBIN

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel