California Court of Appeal

Deficiency judgments in favor of plaintiff-bank on their breach of guaranty claims are affirmed, where defendants failed to present sufficient evidence to create a triable issue on their sham guaranty defense, because they presented insufficient evidence to show that: 1) there was no legal separation between them and the primary obligors on the loans; or 2) that the lender who made the loan structured it in a manner to circumvent the anti-deficiency law.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/20/2013
• Published 12/20/2013

Judges

• ARONSON

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel