California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

In re O.D., A136370

Juvenile court orders finding that defendant-juvenile committed first degree burglary and declaring him to be a ward of the court are affirmed, where: 1) the juvenile court did not err in admitting expert testimony about a palm print implicating him in the burglary; and 2) there was insufficient evidence to sustain the burglary finding.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/27/2013
  • Published 11/27/2013

Judges

  • HUMES

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel