California Court of Appeal

Defendant's conviction for possessing child pornography or child erotica is affirmed, where: 1) there was sufficient evidence that the crime occurred within the statute of limitations and to support the verdict; 2) Penal Code section 311.11 is not void for vagueness; and 3) the trial court did not err in failing to give the jury a unanimity instruction.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/17/2013
• Published 10/17/2013

Judges

• RAMIREZ

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel