California Court of Appeal

The trial court's denial of defendant's motion to compel arbitration in an action to recover allegedly unpaid progress payments under a construction contract for a high-end remodel of defendants' home, is reversed and remanded, where: 1) neither the absence of a definite method, nor the presence of alternative options for appointing an arbitrator renders an otherwise valid arbitration agreement unenforceable; 2) the agreement to arbitrate is valid; and 3) defendants demanded arbitration in accordance with the subject arbitration clause.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/20/2013
• Published 09/20/2013

Judges

• HEESEMAN

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel