California Court of Appeal
Cox v. Los Angeles Unified School District, B239693
The trial court did not err in denying plaintiff's petition for writ of mandate, which sought to compel defendant school district to classify her as one of its permanent employees and to provide her with appropriate pay and benefits, where: 1) plaintiff's failure to work one and a half additional days during the 2008-2009 school year supports defendant's conclusion that the year's service did not constitute a complete school year under the Education Code; and 2) plaintiff was, therefore, properly classified as a probationary employee in 2009-2010, and on March 8, 2010, was properly notified that she was non-reelected effective at the end of that year.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/21/2013
- Published 08/21/2013
Judges
- HEESEMAN
Court
- California Court of Appeal