California Court of Appeal

Judgment for plaintiff in suit contending defendant-employer should have classified her as "non-exempt" and that she was entitled to overtime pay, is affirmed, where: 1) the trial court did not apply an incorrect legal standard to determine that plaintiff was primarily engaged in non-exempt activities; and 2) the trial court did not fail to properly address the "reasonable expectations" rule.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/23/2013
• Published 05/23/2013

Judges

• SUZUKAWA

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel