California Court of Appeal

The trial court properly denied defendant's special motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute on plaintiffs' claims for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of the duty of loyalty, conversion, and invasion of privacy, where plaintiffs' claims did not arise from constitutionally protected speech or petitioning activity but rather from the alleged breach of an attorney's professional and ethical duties owed to former clients.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/15/2013
• Published 05/15/2013

Judges

• GOMES

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel