California Court of Appeal

In family law action, judgment is affirmed, where: 1) because there is no right to counsel in dissolution proceedings, husband's ineffective assistance of counsel claims lack merit; 2) the trial court properly valued the residence pursuant to the parties' stipulation; 3) husband is precluded from arguing that he failed to provide the requisite preliminary declarations; and 4) spousal support, arrearages, interest, and other adjustments were supported by substantial evidence.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/24/2013
• Published 01/24/2013

Judges

• BASKIN

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel