California Court of Appeal

In an action for eminent domain, trial court's grant of the county's motion in limine to exclude the testimony of the defense appraiser is reversed and remanded where: 1) section 822 was not a proper basis for excluding the testimony; and 2) the proffered comparable sales had some tendency in logic to prove the value of the subject property sufficient to make it a jury question, and consequently they are not subject to exclusion under section 816.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/21/2012
• Published 12/21/2012

Judges

• Butz

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel