California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of Stockton, C067164

In plaintiffs' suit seeking to vacate a city's approval of a Wal-Mart Supercenter, trial court's judgment in favor of the defendants is affirmed where: 1) because plaintiffs' second cause of action alleging planning and zoning violations was not commenced within 90 days of the project's approval, it is time barred; and 2) because the remaining causes of action are dependent upon the timeliness of the second cause of action, those causes of action are barred as well.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/13/2012
  • Published 11/13/2012

Judges

  • Blease

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

Copied to clipboard