California Court of Appeal

Defendant's convictions for sex offenses against a child is affirmed where, although the prosecutor's use of a diagram of California to explain proof beyond a reasonable doubt was misconduct, the error was harmless in light of the court's instructions, including the curative instruction given as the result of defendant's objection to the argument and use of the diagram.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/29/2012
• Published 10/29/2012

Judges

• Moore

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel