California Court of Appeal

Defendant's convictions for various offenses arising from his attack on the mother of his children are affirmed, as the trial court did not err in imposing a sentence for defendant's violation of the protective order, because in the absence of some circumstances foreclosing its sentencing discretion, a trial court may base its discretion under section 654 on any of the facts that are in evidence at trial, without regard to the verdicts.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/29/2012
• Published 08/29/2012

Judges

• Butz

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel