California Court of Appeal

In plaintiffs' petition for a writ of administrative mandate invalidating several project approvals of a 230,000-square-foot commercial retail center to be anchored by a Wal-Mart Supercenter, trial court's judgment in favor of the plaintiffs is reversed, as although the notice of the public hearing before the city council was defective, and the city council erroneously approved the development agreement without finding its provisions were consistent with the general plan and the specific plan, there was no showing that the defective notice or the omitted finding was prejudicial.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/31/2012
• Published 07/31/2012

Judges

• King

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel