California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

People v. Snow, C066330

In a prosecution for false imprisonment, to which the defendant pled no contest and was ordered to pay the victim restitution, it is held that: 1) imposing restitution for the victim's dental bill did not violate the Harvey rule against considering facts underlying an uncharged assault, where that incident was not part of the plea bargain and thus not subject to the Harvey rule; and 2) the restitution order was a valid condition of probation that was both reasonably related to the offense to which defendant pled and effectively served the purpose of deterring future criminality.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/30/2012
  • Published 04/30/2012


  • Murray


  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellant:
  • Benjamin Owens, Julie A. Hokans