California Court of Appeal
Scott S. v. Superior Court (Lyon), G046468
A petition for writ review of a trial court order authorizing a county public guardian to consent to amputating the petitioner's infected toe is granted and a writ of mandate directing the trial court to vacate its order is issued, where the trial court erred by relying on a physician's written declaration to find the amputation was medically necessary, since a conservator appointed under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act seeking such an order must show that the desired treatment is medically necessary through admissible evidence.
Appellate Information
- Decided 03/14/2012
- Published 03/14/2012
Judges
- Ikola
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Mark Brown, James C. Harvey