California Court of Appeal

In a dispute stemming from a city's approval of the building of a swimming pool close to a neighbor's property, judgment dismissing the complaint is affirmed, where: 1) the causes of action challenging the city's approval of a zoning variance were barred by the 90-day limitations period set forth in Government Code section 65009; and 2) Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6 did not operate to extend the limitations deadline on the particular facts of the case.

Appellate Information

• Decided 02/24/2012
• Published 02/24/2012

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Jerry Sandefur, Stacey N. Sheston