California Court of Appeal

In an appeal from a judgment of the trial court denying defendants' motion to compel arbitration of plaintiff's employment claims, judgment is affirmed because a provision that requires an prospective employee's assent that, if hired, all disputes that cannot be resolved informally will be submitted to binding arbitration is both procedurally and substantively unenforceable as unconscionable where the language of the provision did not create mutual obligations.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/03/2012
• Published 01/03/2012

Judges

• BLEASE

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel